Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- wiki:innocite [2014/12/12 13:50] – matejash
+++ wiki:innocite [2014/12/24 09:47] – matejash
@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 |[[http://www.alpine-space.eu/uploads/tx_txrunningprojects/InnociteGuideLines-VOL1-Final-EN.pdf|INNOCITÉ Guidelines, Volume 1]]|[[Guidelines]],[[Theory]]| EN        | Policy maker; civil servants / administration; planner; specific institutions  |General state of the art, problems and general methodology is presented here - although the document is classified as "Guidelines" it is more of a theoretical framework. **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_guidelines_1|in-depth information about Guidelines Volume 1]]** |
 |[[http://www.alpine-space.eu/uploads/tx_txrunningprojects/InnociteGuideLines-VOL2-Final-EN.pdf|INNOCITÉ Guidelines, Volume 2]]|[[Guidelines]], [[Tool]]| EN        | Policy maker; civil servants / administration; planner; specific institutions  |The key document that is a step-by-step guideline intended for policy-makers and key decision-makers of peri-urban SMESTO's to start new development proccesses by participatory approach. It also includes some tools (InnoServices) to help construct Private-Public Partnerships. **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_guidelines_2|in-depth information about Guidelines Volume 2]]**  |
-|[[http://www.alpine-space.eu/uploads/tx_txrunningprojects/InnociteGuideLines-VOL3_Final-EN.pdf|INNOCITÉ Guidelines, Volume 3]]|[[Guidelines]], [[Best practice]], [[Pilot Activity]]| EN        | Decision-maker Planner Scientists Specific institutions  |The last set of Guidelines are more of a report on how the Guidelines from Volume 2 were implemented in pilot regions and also to present some good practices of raising attractivnes by participatory approach of certain SMESTO's. **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_guidelines_3|in-depth information about Guidelines Volume 3]]**  |
+|[[http://www.alpine-space.eu/uploads/tx_txrunningprojects/InnociteGuideLines-VOL3_Final-EN.pdf|INNOCITÉ Guidelines, Volume 3]]|[[Guidelines]], [[Best practice]], [[Pilot Activity]]| EN        | Policy maker; civil servants / administration; planner; specific institutions  |The last set of Guidelines are more of a report on how the Guidelines from Volume 2 were implemented in pilot regions and also to present some good practices of raising attractivnes by participatory approach of certain SMESTO's. **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_guidelines_3|in-depth information about Guidelines Volume 3]]**  |
-|[[http://www.alpine-space.eu/uploads/tx_txrunningprojects/InnoCite_Diagnosis_Tool.pdf|INNOCITÉ Diagnosis Tool]]|[[Tool]], [[Methodology]]| EN        | Decision-maker Planner Scientists Specific institutions|Methodology for collecting data and comparing different areas.  **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_diagnosis_tool|in-depth information about Diagnosis Tool]]** |
+|[[http://www.alpine-space.eu/uploads/tx_txrunningprojects/InnoCite_Diagnosis_Tool.pdf|INNOCITÉ Diagnosis Tool]]|[[Tool]], [[Methodology]]| EN        | Policy maker; civil servants / administration; planner; specific institutions|Methodology for collecting data and comparing different areas.  **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_diagnosis_tool|in-depth information about Diagnosis Tool]]** |
-|[[http://www.alpine-space.eu/uploads/tx_txrunningprojects/Innocite_WP5_Handbook.pdf|Handbook on WP5: Innovative strategies]]|[[Database]], [[recommendations]]| EN        | Decision-maker Planner Scientists Specific institutions   |A collection of common problems of small cities in AS and possible solutions.  **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_handbook_wp5|in-depth information about recommendation on Innovative strategies]]**|
+|[[http://www.alpine-space.eu/uploads/tx_txrunningprojects/Innocite_WP5_Handbook.pdf|Handbook on WP5: Innovative strategies]]|[[Database]], [[recommendations]]| EN        | Policy maker; civil servants / administration; planner; specific institutions   |A collection of common problems of small cities in AS and possible solutions.  **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_handbook_wp5|in-depth information about recommendation on Innovative strategies]]**|
-|[[http://www.alpine-space.eu/uploads/tx_txrunningprojects/4th_Synthesis_of_partners_dashboards_action_sheet_March2011.pdf|WP6 Pilot cases implementation]]|[[Report]]| EN        | Decision-maker Planner Scientists Specific institutions   |Reports from project partners on implementation of actions in pilot sites.  **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_pilot_cases|in-depth information about report on pilot cases implementation]]**  |
+|[[http://www.alpine-space.eu/uploads/tx_txrunningprojects/4th_Synthesis_of_partners_dashboards_action_sheet_March2011.pdf|WP6 Pilot cases implementation]]|[[Report]]| EN        | Policy maker; civil servants / administration; planner; specific institutions   |Reports from project partners on implementation of actions in pilot sites.  **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_pilot_cases|in-depth information about report on pilot cases implementation]]**  |
-|[[http://www.alpine-space.eu/uploads/tx_txrunningprojects/Innocite_WP5_Handbook.pdf|SWOT - Handbook for WP 5]]|[[Report]]| EN        | Decision-maker Planner Scientists Specific institutions   |SWOT analysis of pilot areas and some common conclusions regarding SMESTO's in AS. **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_swot_handbook_wp5|in-depth information about SWOT on Handbook WP5]]**  |
+|[[http://www.alpine-space.eu/uploads/tx_txrunningprojects/Innocite_WP5_Handbook.pdf|SWOT - Handbook for WP 5]]|[[Report]]| EN        | Policy maker; civil servants / administration; planner; specific institutions   |SWOT analysis of pilot areas and some common conclusions regarding SMESTO's in AS. **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_swot_handbook_wp5|in-depth information about SWOT on Handbook WP5]]**  |
-|[[http://www.innocite.eu/Lists/PublicAreaDocs/InnoServices_English_version.zip|INNOservices]]|[[Tool]]| EN        | Decision-maker Planner Scientists Specific institutions   |The tool is integrated in the InnoServices methodology for territorial diagnosis and development of business services. It helps to have a territorial vision on multicriteria evaluation of the services and constitutes a tool for decision support.   The use of the tool is done in two phases: a period of adaptation to local territorial context (setting) and a time to assess services and assist in the decision. **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_innoservices| in-depth information about INNOservices]]**
+|[[http://www.innocite.eu/Lists/PublicAreaDocs/InnoServices_English_version.zip|INNOservices]]|[[Tool]]| EN        | Economic sector, policy-makers   |The tool is integrated in the InnoServices methodology for territorial diagnosis and development of business services. It helps to have a territorial vision on multicriteria evaluation of the services and constitutes a tool for decision support. The use of the tool is done in two phases: a period of adaptation to local territorial context (setting) and a time to assess services and assist in the decision. **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_innoservices| in-depth information about INNOservices]]** |
-|Survey to decisionmakers and shopkeepers|tool|DE|Document presents a checklist for town assessment|
+|Survey to decisionmakers and shopkeepers|tool|DE|decision-makers| Document presents a checklist for town assessment. **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_survey|in-depth information about Survey to decisionmakers and shopkeepers]]** |
+|Innocité Pilot Sites Forum |guidelines | EN | policy maker; civil servants / administration; planner; specific institutions |Pilot sites forum took place on 17th and 18th of June 2010 amd was dedicated to the development challenges of a small townes positioned in the metropolitan context. **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_pilot_sites|in-depth information about Innocité Pilot Sites Forum]]**|
+|Transnational comparison of the pilot sites | report |EN|involved partners|The document present the results of the analysis, based on Innocite diagnosis tool. **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_transnational_comparison|in-depth information about Transnational comparison of the pilot sites]]**|
-==Outcomes and Impacts==
-Unlike project outputs, outcomes and results cannot be described in a standardised way. Therefore, they are listed as free text:\\
-//<not yet available>//
 {{tag>"territorial development" "urban-rural partnership" "peri-urban development"]}}