wiki:econnect
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
wiki:econnect [2014/06/20 14:10] – carolinep | wiki:econnect [2017/03/23 14:17] (current) – apolderman | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | **Econnect** | + | =====Econnect===== |
{{ : | {{ : | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* Duration: 01/09/2008 - 30/11/2011 | * Duration: 01/09/2008 - 30/11/2011 | ||
* [[http:// | * [[http:// | ||
- | * [[http:// | + | * [[http:// |
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
=== Project summary === | === Project summary === | ||
- | " | + | " |
- | Source: [[http:// | + | Source: [[http:// |
=== Hypotheses === | === Hypotheses === | ||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
===Results=== | ===Results=== | ||
- | Results of a project can be differentiated in [[# | + | [[Results]] of a project can be differentiated in [[wiki: |
- | Project outputs can generally be identified very easily. Yet, they represent only a first step towards the ultimate objective of project interventions: | + | |
==Outputs== | ==Outputs== | ||
- | Outputs are an immediate deliverable of a project, which result from a development intervention. They should be finalised and publicly available by the time the project terminates. Outputs comprise tangible project results such as tools, databases, executive summaries, educational material etc. | + | |
^ Output^ Category^Language(s)^Target group^Remark | ^ Output^ Category^Language(s)^Target group^Remark | ||
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Résumé of project outputs== | ||
+ | __Results which are directly or indirectly suitable or applicable for practitioners / politicians and civil servants / administration: | ||
+ | * The main results of the projects are suitable and applicable for practitioners / politicians and civil servants / administration. They serve to inform and increase the knowledge (state of the art) of ecological connectivity. | ||
+ | |||
+ | __Which of the project results are usable for which aspect of SSD and which are the most relevant for practitioners / politicians and civil servants / administration? | ||
+ | * Policy recommendations, | ||
+ | |||
+ | __Are there results which need further steps to be useful for practitioners / politicians and civil servants / administration? | ||
+ | * It appears essential to better integrate the established pilot regions in all future Alpine-wide initiatives and actions. […]in upcoming initiatives the integration of other essential sectors that markedly influence the decisions in respect to ecological networks in the Alps can be improved on. This urgently calls for trans-sectoral funding schemes, the development of a common | ||
+ | |||
+ | __Which kinds of stakeholders have been involved, how have their competences been used in the project and are there options for a better implementation? | ||
+ | * Non-professional photographers were invited to take pictures showing barriers and corridors in the Alps and to share their images through an on line service (Flickr). A class of photograph students was invited to use their creativity to explore ecological connectivity: | ||
+ | * It seems necessary to foresee a shift of competences towards a central unit, that should be responsible for transnational, | ||
+ | |||
+ | __Are the results (tool, method, indicator, recommendation) directly or indirectly addressing the strategic objectives for the Alpine Space?__\\ | ||
+ | * The results address two of the strategic objectives: Sustainable managed biodiversity and landscapes & Sustainable resource management and production | ||
+ | |||
+ | __What could be long-term outcomes of this project? If none, why low impact? Why high impact? What is needed to achieve outcomes in the long-run? | ||
+ | * Econnect contributed significantly to increasing the knowledge about existing ecological barriers and corridors in the Alps and their inherent complexity.By looking at the landscape from a functional, | ||
==Outcomes and Impacts== | ==Outcomes and Impacts== | ||
- | Outcomes are the likely or achieved short-term and medium-term effects of an intervention' | + | |
- | \\ Impacts are positive | + | Unlike project |
- | \\ As outcomes | + | |
- | \\ The identification of outcomes and impacts requires | + | __Further synergies__\\ |
- | //<to be filled in>// | + | The documents on different animal species could be done for other species. |
+ | |||
+ | __Achievements that could be further implemented__\\ | ||
+ | The evaluation of priority areas can be based on the indicators | ||
+ | The results derived from this analysis process will serve as a basis for future spatial planning processes so that the spaces not yet fragmented | ||
+ | Establishment | ||
+ | |||
+ | __ | ||
+ | Remaining gaps__\\ | ||
+ | "there is a limited knowledge on the complex | ||
+ | "the administrations of protected areas within the Pilot Regions need to be equipped with adequate financial and personal resources to pursue their complex tasks and functions" | ||
+ | |||
+ | __Emerging contradictions__\\ | ||
+ | " | ||
=== Accessibility of project results === | === Accessibility of project results === | ||
* [[http:// | * [[http:// | ||
- | * [[http:// | + | * [[http:// |
+ | |||
+ | === Synergies === | ||
+ | * [[wiki: | ||
+ | * [[wiki: | ||
+ | * [[wiki: | ||
+ | * [[wiki: | ||
+ | * [[wiki: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{tag>" |
wiki/econnect.1403266226.txt.gz · Last modified: 2014/06/20 14:10 by carolinep