User Tools

Site Tools


wiki:protection_forest

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
wiki:protection_forest [2018/07/16 09:11] sebastianwiki:protection_forest [2018/11/27 10:45] (current) marsth
Line 22: Line 22:
 To accomplish this there are different model approaches possible depending on the scale of the assessment and the available geodata. A very good overview of these approaches can be looked up in the reports of various Projects ([[http://193.170.148.89/enfin/projects_proalp.html|ProAlp]], [[http://www.alpine-space.org/2007-2013/projects/projects/detail/PARAmount/show/index-2.html|PARAmount]], [[https://www.bafu.admin.ch/bafu/de/home/themen/naturgefahren/fachinformationen/naturgefahrensituation-und-raumnutzung/gefahrengrundlagen/silvaprotect-ch.html|SilvaProtect]]) To accomplish this there are different model approaches possible depending on the scale of the assessment and the available geodata. A very good overview of these approaches can be looked up in the reports of various Projects ([[http://193.170.148.89/enfin/projects_proalp.html|ProAlp]], [[http://www.alpine-space.org/2007-2013/projects/projects/detail/PARAmount/show/index-2.html|PARAmount]], [[https://www.bafu.admin.ch/bafu/de/home/themen/naturgefahren/fachinformationen/naturgefahrensituation-und-raumnutzung/gefahrengrundlagen/silvaprotect-ch.html|SilvaProtect]])
  
-Within the AlpES project the provision dynamics of the ES[[:wiki:protection_of_areas_against_avalanches_mudslides_and_rockfalls_in_the_alps|protection of areas against avalanches, mudslides and rockfalls in the Alps ]](here you put the link to the new article) were assessed by means of the following supply, demand and flow indicators:+Within the [[:wiki:alpesbackground|AlpES project]] the provision dynamics of the ES [[:wiki:protection_of_areas_against_avalanches_mudslides_and_rockfalls_in_the_alps|protection of areas against avalanches, mudslides and rockfalls in the Alps]] were assessed by means of the following supply, demand and flow indicators:
  
-  * Supply: [[:wiki:protection_forest|Site-protecting fores]][[:wiki:protection_forest|t]][[:wiki:site-protecting_forest| ]](%) +  * Supply: [[:wiki:protection_forest_calc|Site-protecting forest]] (%) 
-  * Flow: Object-projecting forest (%) +  * Flow: [[:wiki:protection_forest_calc|Object-projecting forest]] (%) 
-  * Demand: Infrastructure at risk (%)+  * Demand: [[:wiki:protection_forest_calc|Infrastructure at risk]] (%)
  
 **Web links ** **Web links **
Line 48: Line 48:
   * PARAmount Project PP4-PP10, 2012. Avalanche Guidelines -guide‐lines for snow‐avalanches hazard.   * PARAmount Project PP4-PP10, 2012. Avalanche Guidelines -guide‐lines for snow‐avalanches hazard.
   * Rickenmann, D., 2005. Runout prediction methods, in: Debris-Flow Hazards and Related Phenomena. Springer, pp. 305–324.   * Rickenmann, D., 2005. Runout prediction methods, in: Debris-Flow Hazards and Related Phenomena. Springer, pp. 305–324.
 +  * Voigt, S., 2010.  Der Schutzwald im Alpenraum - Länderübergreifende Harmonisierung der Abgrenzungskriterien für die Schutzwaldausweisung und deren GIS gestützte Modellierung und Verortung - Master Thesis, Universität Salzburg
 ~~DISCUSSION~~{{tag> "ecosystem_services" "AlpES_project" }} ~~DISCUSSION~~{{tag> "ecosystem_services" "AlpES_project" }}
  
  
wiki/protection_forest.1531725082.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/07/16 09:11 by sebastian