Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- wiki:recreational_offer [2018/07/12 15:16] – eurac
+++ wiki:recreational_offer [2018/07/18 12:01] (current) – eurac
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Protected areas</font>
-  * <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>DEM</font>  * <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Open street map</font>  * <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Landcover</font>
+  * <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>DEM</font>
+  * <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Open street map</font>
+  * <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Landcover</font>
 ==== Calculation processes: ====
@@ Line 71: / Line 73: @@
 <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>The recreation potential was overlaid with the level of accessibility by multiplying the two layers in order to exclude inaccessible areas and map the recreation supply.</font>
+{{:en:20181701outdoor_recreation_supply1.jpg?nolink&3278x2037}}
+{{:en:test_legens.jpg?nolink&500x297}}
 **<font 11.0pt/11;;inherit;;inherit>Table 2: Landscape variables used as indicators of outdoor recreation potential.</font>**
@@ Line 77: / Line 83: @@
 |  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Naturalness</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Index of naturalness (hemeroby)</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Preference for more natural environments for outdoor recreation(Peña et al., 2015; Willemen et al., 2008)</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>CORINE land cover (EEA, 2016a)</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Attribution of hemeroby classes to land cover types (Paracchini & Capitani, 2011)</font>|
 |  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Protected areas</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Presence of protected area</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Natural environment and high biodiversity (Sonter et al., 2016) and public recreation areas (Paracchini et al., 2014)</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Natura 2000 database (EEA, 2015b); Common Database on Designated Areas (CDDA) (EEA, 2015a)</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Attribution of scores to IUCN categories (Zulian et al., 2013)</font>|
-|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Presence of water</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Distance to water bodies</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Recreational opportunities (Keeler et al., 2015) and high visual attraction (Arriaza et al., 2004; Ode et al., 2009)</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>CORINE land cover (EEA, 2016a)</font>\\  |  <font 14px/14px;;inherit;;inherit>Impedance function of attractiveness (distance < 2000 m) from coastlines of sea and lakes (Paracchini et al., 2014)</font>|
+|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Presence of water</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Distance to water bodies</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Recreational opportunities (Keeler et al., 2015) and high visual attraction (Arriaza et al., 2004; Ode et al., 2009)</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>CORINE land cover (EEA, 2016a)</font>|  <font 14px/14px;;inherit;;inherit>Impedance function of attractiveness (distance < 2000 m) from coastlines of sea and lakes (Paracchini et al., 2014)</font>|
-|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Landscape composition</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Landscape diversity</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>High recreational and visual attractiveness of diverse landscapes (Kienast et al., 2012; Ode et al., 2009; Schirpke et al., 2016)</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>CORINE land cover (EEA, 2016a)</font>\\  |  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Number of land cover types per km2 (Kienast et al., 2012)</font>|
+|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Landscape composition</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Landscape diversity</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>High recreational and visual attractiveness of diverse landscapes (Kienast et al., 2012; Ode et al., 2009; Schirpke et al., 2016)</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>CORINE land cover (EEA, 2016a)</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Number of land cover types per km2 (Kienast et al., 2012)</font>|
 |  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Type of relief</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Terrain Ruggedness Index (TRI)</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Recreational opportunities and visual attraction of rough landscapes (Weyland & Laterra, 2014)</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>DEM (EEA, 2016b)</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>TRI classes (Riley et al., 1999)</font>|
 |  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Mountain peaks</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Density of mountain summits</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Recreational opportunities (Pomfret, 2011), overview and remoteness (Kienast et al., 2012), and visual attraction (D'Antonio & Monz, 2016)</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>DEM (EEA, 2016b)</font>|  <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Identification of mountain peaks (Podobnikar, 2012), number of summits per 10 km<sup>2</sup></font>|
@@ Line 84: / Line 90: @@
 <font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>References:</font>
-<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Ala-Hulkko, T., Kotavaara, O., Alahuhta, J., Helle, P., Hjort, J., 2016. Introducing accessibility analysis in mapping cultural ecosystem services, Ecol. Ind. 66, 416-427.</font>
+Aulagnier S, Giannatos G, Herrero J (2008b) Rupicapra rupicapra. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008: e.T39255A10179647 [[http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T39255A10179647.en|http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T39255A10179647.en]] Downloaded on 01 June 2017
-<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Arriaza, M., Cañas-Ortega, J.F., Cañas-Madueño, J.A., Ruiz-Aviles, P., 2004. Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes, Landscape Urban Plann. 69, 115-125. doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.029.</font>
-<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>D'Antonio, A., Monz, C., 2016. The influence of visitor use levels on visitor spatial behavior in off-trail areas of dispersed recreation use, J. Environ. Manage. 170, 79-87.</font>
-<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>European Environment Agency (EEA), 2015a. European inventory of nationally designated areas. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/nationally-designated-areas-national-cdda-1 (accessed 21.10.16).</font>
-<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>European Environment Agency (EEA), 2015b. Natura 2000 data - the European network of protected sites. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/natura-7 (accessed 21.10.16).</font>
-<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>European Environment Agency (EEA), 2016a. CORINE Land Cover (CLC) 2012, Version 18.5.1. http://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover/clc-2012 (accessed 21.10.16).</font>
-<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>European Environmental Agency (EEA), 2016b. European Digital Elevation Model (EU-DEM), Version 1.0. http://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/satellite-derived-products/eu-dem/eu-dem-v1-0-and-derived-products/eu-dem-v1.0/view (accessed 24.10.16)</font>
-<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Keeler, B.L., Wood, S.A., Polasky, S., Kling, C., Filstrup, C.T., Downing, J.A., 2015. Recreational demand for clean water: evidence from geotagged photographs by visitors to lakes, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 13, 76-81.</font>
-<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Kienast, F., Degenhardt, B., Weilenmann, B., Wäger, Y., Buchecker, M., 2012. GIS-assisted mapping of landscape suitability for nearby recreation, Landscape Urban Plann. 105, 385-399.</font>
+Aulagnier S, Kranz A, Lovari S, Jdeidi T, Masseti M, Nader I, de Smet K, Cuzin F (2008) Capra ibex. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008: e.T42397A10695445.[[http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T42397A10695445.en| http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T42397A10695445.en]].Downloaded on 26 May 2017
-<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Ode, Å, Fry, G., Tveit, M.S., Messager, P., Miller, D., 2009. Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference, J. Environ. Manage. 90, 375-383. doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.013.</font>
+Bilz M (2013) Gentiana acaulis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: e.T203217A2762385. [[http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2013-1.RLTS.T203217A2762385.en|http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2013-1.RLTS.T203217A2762385.en]]
-<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>OpenStreetMap (OSM), 2016. OpenStreetMap. Available from: http://download.geofabrik.de/europe.html (accessed 09.11.16)</font>
+<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Caudullo G, de Rigo D (2016) Pinus cembra in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz J, de Rigo D, Caudullo G, Houston Durrant T, Mauri A (Eds.), European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. Publ. Off. EU, Luxembourg, pp. e01bd9b+ Da Ronch F, Caudullo G, Tinner W, de Rigo D (2016) Larix decidua and other larches in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz J, de Rigo D, Caudullo G, Houston Durrant T, Mauri A (Eds.), European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. Publ. Off. EU, Luxembourg, pp. e01e492+ <font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Galluzzi M, Armanini M, Ferrari G, Zibordi F, Scaravelli D, Chirici G, Nocentini S, Mustoni A (2017) Habitat Suitability Models, for ecological study of the alpine marmot in the central Italian Alps. Ecological Informatics 37:10-17</font>
-<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Paracchini, M.L., Capitani, C., 2011. Implementation of a EU-wide indicator for the rural-agrarian landscape. EUR 25114 EN. Publications office of the European Union, 89 p.</font>
+<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Ischer M, Dubuis A, Keller R, Vittoz P (2014) A better understanding of the ecological conditions for Leontopodium alpinum Cassini in the Swiss Alps. Folia Geobotanica 49:541-558</font>
-<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Paracchini, M.L., Zulian, G., Kopperoinen, L., Maes, J., Schägner, J.P., Termansen, M., Zandersen, M., Perez-Soba, M., Scholefield, P.A., Bidoglio, G., 2014. Mapping cultural ecosystem services: A framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU, Ecol. Ind. 45, 371-385. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.018.</font>
+<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Oberdorfer E, Schwabe A, Müller T (2001) Pflanzensoziologische Exkursionsflora für Deutschland und angrenzende Gebiete. 8. Auflage, Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart (Hohenheim), ISBN 3-8001-3131-5, pp. 756</font>
-<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Peña, L., Casado-Arzuaga, I., Onaindia, M., 2015. Mapping recreation supply and demand using an ecological and a social evaluation approach, Ecosystem Services 13, 108-118. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.008.</font>
+<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Schirpke U., Meisch C., Tappeiner U., (submitted) Symbolic species as a cultural ecosystem service in the European Alps: insights and open issues. Landscape Ecology</font>
-<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Schirpke, U., Meisch, C., Marsoner, T., Tappeiner, U., 2017. Revealing spatial and temporal patterns of outdoor recreation in the European Alps and their surroundings. Ecosystem Services, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.017.</font>
+<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Soutullo A, Urios V, Ferrer M (2006) How far away in an hour? Daily movements of juvenile Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) tracked with satellite telemetry. Journal of Ornithology 147:69-72</font>
 \\