User Tools

Site Tools

wiki:stakeh_austria

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision		Previous revision
wiki:stakeh_austria [2014/12/13 12:37] – created dominikcswiki:stakeh_austria [2017/03/24 14:37] (current) – andreash
Line 1: Line 1:
-**Stakeholder analysis for Austria**+===== Stakeholder Analysis for Austria =====
  
-__Branches and types of stakeholders__+===Branches and types of stakeholders===
 With respect to the thematic fields, it can be stated that the number of stakeholders within “resource efficiency” is 50% higher than within the field “inclusive growth”. Almost 45% of all stakeholders (both fields) are either research institutes or universities. Since these institutions are predominantly public, it is not surprising that only 8% of the total number of stakeholders can be classified as private. Research institutes and universities are mostly located at the national—to a lower degree—regional level, thus, this fact leads to a very low number of stakeholders at the local level, which only represents 6% of the total cases.  With respect to the thematic fields, it can be stated that the number of stakeholders within “resource efficiency” is 50% higher than within the field “inclusive growth”. Almost 45% of all stakeholders (both fields) are either research institutes or universities. Since these institutions are predominantly public, it is not surprising that only 8% of the total number of stakeholders can be classified as private. Research institutes and universities are mostly located at the national—to a lower degree—regional level, thus, this fact leads to a very low number of stakeholders at the local level, which only represents 6% of the total cases. 
  
  
-__Thematic focus of stakeholders__+===Thematic focus of stakeholders===
 Regarding the thematic interest of the stakeholders, environmental planning (23%) and regional development (15%) are the most frequent classes, which are mainly ascribed to their larger thematic field (“resource efficiency” and “inclusive growth,” respectively). While only 4% of the partners are located outside the Alpine Convention’s limits, about 13% of all partners have been lead partner—at least in one project. Interestingly, only 35% of the stakeholders have participated in just one project, while the vast majority participated in two or more projects (up to five).  Regarding the thematic interest of the stakeholders, environmental planning (23%) and regional development (15%) are the most frequent classes, which are mainly ascribed to their larger thematic field (“resource efficiency” and “inclusive growth,” respectively). While only 4% of the partners are located outside the Alpine Convention’s limits, about 13% of all partners have been lead partner—at least in one project. Interestingly, only 35% of the stakeholders have participated in just one project, while the vast majority participated in two or more projects (up to five). 
  
Line 11: Line 11:
  
  
-__Summary__+===Summary===
 In sum, these interpretations support the results of a project in-depth analysis within the “resource efficiency” field: they led to the conclusion that only a few tools and methods developed for the broad public are available, and that the majority of findings is directed to a scientific readership; without a doubt, this weakness is related to the stakeholder network structure as shown by the case of Austria, where research and university stakeholders predominate.  In sum, these interpretations support the results of a project in-depth analysis within the “resource efficiency” field: they led to the conclusion that only a few tools and methods developed for the broad public are available, and that the majority of findings is directed to a scientific readership; without a doubt, this weakness is related to the stakeholder network structure as shown by the case of Austria, where research and university stakeholders predominate. 
  
wiki/stakeh_austria.1418470654.txt.gz · Last modified: 2014/12/13 12:37 by dominikcs