Biomass production from grassland - Flow [WIKIAlps

This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong.
====== Biomass production from grassland - Flow ======

==== General description: ====

The flow indicator is defined as the fraction of the local yield that is utilized, expressed by its energy content [MJ NEL ha<sup>-1</sup>  y<sup>-1</sup>  ]. Hence, it introduces a forage quality component to the yield calculation and allows for computing the energy balance combined with the energy demand indicator. Furthermore, losses due to grazing, harvesting and storage processes are considered.
==== Input data ====

  * Supply indicator (as calculated in the previous section of this document)
  * Values on energy content in biomass * Pastures areas
  * Harvest and transpiration loss estimates

==== Calculation processes ====

<font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>**(1) Calculate the energy content**</font>

  * <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Calculate the average energy content (MJ NEL t<sup>-1</sup> DM) of the cut biomass considering vegetation type, harvesting date and method (values according to Resch et al., 2006).</font>

<font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>**(2) Calculate forage pasture area**</font>

  * <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>For the calculation of the flow indicator, the land cover delimitations for the local yield estimates can be used.</font><font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>However, this data does not allow for distinguishing between meadows and pastures that are grazed or cut and those left barren due to topographical condition and harsh accessibility. Hence, the effective forage extent might differ from the one derived from Corine Land Cover and a hence, a correction based on statistical data on a municipality level might be necessary. For details, please refer to Jäger 2017.</font>

<font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>**(3) Calculate energy yield at the stock**</font>

  * <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>The yield at the stock describes the aboveground biomass that is growing on the forage area, expressed by its energy content [MJ NEL ha<sup>-1</sup>]. For this purpose the forage area from step (2) is multiplied with the mean energy yield per ha from step (1).</font> * <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>If specific data on pasture forage types and uses is available, a more detailed approach can be taken into consideration (for details please refer to Jäger 2017).</font>

<font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Otherwise, the calculation can be done directly based on the land cover classes.</font>

<font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>**(4) Calculate the gross yield**</font>

  * <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>The amount of fodder that is removed from the stock is called gross yield. Here, losses from harvesting and transpiration are responsible for the deduction. The harvest and transpiration losses range from 5 to 30 % (Buchgraber 2004, p. 49).</font>

<font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>**(5) Calculate the Net Yield**</font>

  * <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>The net yield is the amount of fodder that is actually consumed by livestock. When computing losses from gross yield to net yield, the specific storage and feeding techniques used have a major impact. Losses during storage and feeding account for anywhere between 5% and 40% (Buchgraber 2004, p. 49). Due to the fact that these factors depend on individual farm management, mean values are used to calculate the deduction: as a total mean, 15% will be deducted for all losses.</font>

{{:en:biomass_grassland_flow11.jpg?nolink&450x774}}

{{:en:test_legens.jpg?nolink&500x297}}

__<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>References:</font>__

__<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Resch R, Guggenberger T, Wiedner G, et al.: Futterwerttabellen für das Grundfutter im Alpenraum.Der fortschrittliche Landwirt 84:1-20, 2006.</font>__

__<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Jäger H. (2017): Mapping of supply and demand of biomass from Alpine Grassland.Master Thesis. Technical University of Munich.</font>__

__<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Buchgraber K: Zeitgemässe Grünland-Bewirtschaftung 2., völlig neu bearb.Aufl. Edition. Graz [u.a.]: Graz [u.a.]: Stocker, 2004.</font>__