Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- wiki:biomass_production_from_grassland_-_flow [2018/07/11 12:01] – sebastian
+++ wiki:biomass_production_from_grassland_-_flow [2018/07/12 16:41] (current) – sebastian
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-==== Biomass production from grassland - Flow ====
+====== Biomass production from grassland - Flow ======
 ==== General description: ====
-The flow indicator is defined as the fraction of the local yield that is utilized, expressed by its energy content [MJ NEL ha<sup>-1</sup> ]. Hence, it introduces a forage quality component to the yield calculation and allows for computing the energy balance combined with the energy demand indicator. Furthermore, losses due to grazing, harvesting and storage processes are considered.
+The flow indicator is defined as the fraction of the local yield that is utilized, expressed by its energy content [MJ NEL ha<sup>-1</sup>  ]. Hence, it introduces a forage quality component to the yield calculation and allows for computing the energy balance combined with the energy demand indicator. Furthermore, losses due to grazing, harvesting and storage processes are considered.
 ==== Input data ====
@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
   * <font 14px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>The net yield is the amount of fodder that is actually consumed by livestock. When computing losses from gross yield to net yield, the specific storage and feeding techniques used have a major impact. Losses during storage and feeding account for anywhere between 5% and 40% (Buchgraber 2004, p. 49). Due to the fact that these factors depend on individual farm management, mean values are used to calculate the deduction: as a total mean, 15% will be deducted for all losses.</font>
-<font 10.0pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>References:</font>
+<font 26px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>**Biomass Production**</font>
-<font 10.0pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Resch R, Guggenberger T, Wiedner G, et al.: Futterwerttabellen für das Grundfutter im Alpenraum.</font><font 10.0pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Der fortschrittliche Landwirt 84:1-20, 2006.</font>
+{{:en:biomass_grassland_supply.jpg?nolink&100x200}}
-<font 10.0pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Jäger H. (2017): Mapping of supply and demand of biomass from Alpine Grassland.</font><font 10.0pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Master Thesis. Technical University of Munich.</font>
+Flowchart depicting the procedures used to derive the flow indicator
-<font 10.0pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Buchgraber K: Zeitgemässe Grünland-Bewirtschaftung 2., völlig neu bearb.</font><font 10.0pt/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Aufl. Edition. Graz [u.a.]: Graz [u.a.]: Stocker, 2004.</font>
+__<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>References:</font>__
+__<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Resch R, Guggenberger T, Wiedner G, et al.: Futterwerttabellen für das Grundfutter im Alpenraum.Der fortschrittliche Landwirt 84:1-20, 2006.</font>__
+__<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Jäger H. (2017): Mapping of supply and demand of biomass from Alpine Grassland.Master Thesis. Technical University of Munich.</font>__
+__<font 12px/inherit;;inherit;;inherit>Buchgraber K: Zeitgemässe Grünland-Bewirtschaftung 2., völlig neu bearb.Aufl. Edition. Graz [u.a.]: Graz [u.a.]: Stocker, 2004.</font>__