wiki:in-depth_analysis
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
wiki:in-depth_analysis [2014/12/02 12:14] – claudias | wiki:in-depth_analysis [2014/12/08 12:09] (current) – claudias | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
- | This action | + | This action |
- | * Therefore the in-depth analysis | + | * Therefore the in-depth analysis |
- | * As a second step the “benefit options” of the whole project | + | * As a second step the “benefit options” of the whole project |
- | The results of each project | + | The results of each project |
The **additional information about project outputs** is structured by so-called leading questions: | The **additional information about project outputs** is structured by so-called leading questions: | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* Is it ‘aging’ (like data, recommendations) or timeless (like a label)?\\ | * Is it ‘aging’ (like data, recommendations) or timeless (like a label)?\\ | ||
__Keywords__\\ | __Keywords__\\ | ||
- | Keywords | + | The keywords are highlighting the main focus of the result. These can be used to detect synergies and interrelations between projects. The better the keywords, the easier a result can be detected by users of the wiki and the easier also correspondences between projects can be discovered. |
- | Therefore keywords should be as precise as possible and should not only use the AS program keywords of the project. | + | |
__Accessibility__\\ | __Accessibility__\\ | ||
Is there full access of data and maps for capitalization (open access, limited access, restricted access)?\\ | Is there full access of data and maps for capitalization (open access, limited access, restricted access)?\\ | ||
Line 32: | Line 31: | ||
** | ** | ||
Interpretation of projects**\\ | Interpretation of projects**\\ | ||
- | Besides the more descriptive information about the results, WIKIAlps | + | Besides the more descriptive information about the results, WIKIAlps |
__ | __ | ||
How to interpret the contributions of the projects? | How to interpret the contributions of the projects? | ||
- | Again leading questions | + | Again leading questions |
__ | __ | ||
- | The following questions | + | The following questions |
* Are the results or some of them directly or indirectly suitable or applicable for practitioners / politicians and civil servants / administration? | * Are the results or some of them directly or indirectly suitable or applicable for practitioners / politicians and civil servants / administration? | ||
* Which of the project results are usable for which aspect of SSD and which are the most relevant for practitioners / politicians and civil servants / administration? | * Which of the project results are usable for which aspect of SSD and which are the most relevant for practitioners / politicians and civil servants / administration? | ||
Line 53: | Line 52: | ||
* Have been methodologies developed which could be made better accessible or transferable for other SSD-relevant tasks? | * Have been methodologies developed which could be made better accessible or transferable for other SSD-relevant tasks? | ||
* Are there further territorial areas or areas with similar conditions in which the approach could be applied? | * Are there further territorial areas or areas with similar conditions in which the approach could be applied? | ||
- | * Unordered List ItemAre | + | * Are there synergies in terms of tasks, methodologies, |
- Achievements that could be further implemented: | - Achievements that could be further implemented: | ||
* Are there implementations in the pilot areas of the project, which could be extended to a larger area (in the pilot area or even beyond)? | * Are there implementations in the pilot areas of the project, which could be extended to a larger area (in the pilot area or even beyond)? |
wiki/in-depth_analysis.txt · Last modified: 2014/12/08 12:09 by claudias