User Tools

Site Tools


wiki:innocite

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
wiki:innocite [2014/12/12 13:51] matejashwiki:innocite [2017/03/23 14:20] (current) apolderman
Line 1: Line 1:
-**INNOCITÉ**+=====INNOCITÉ=====
 {{ :wiki:innocite-4c_en.jpg?200|}}\\ {{ :wiki:innocite-4c_en.jpg?200|}}\\
 //How to Improve Competitiveness of Small-Medium Cities under the Influence of Alpine Great Urban Centers// //How to Improve Competitiveness of Small-Medium Cities under the Influence of Alpine Great Urban Centers//
Line 49: Line 49:
 |[[http://www.alpine-space.eu/uploads/tx_txrunningprojects/Innocite_WP5_Handbook.pdf|Handbook on WP5: Innovative strategies]]|[[Database]], [[recommendations]]| EN        | Policy maker; civil servants / administration; planner; specific institutions   |A collection of common problems of small cities in AS and possible solutions.  **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_handbook_wp5|in-depth information about recommendation on Innovative strategies]]**| |[[http://www.alpine-space.eu/uploads/tx_txrunningprojects/Innocite_WP5_Handbook.pdf|Handbook on WP5: Innovative strategies]]|[[Database]], [[recommendations]]| EN        | Policy maker; civil servants / administration; planner; specific institutions   |A collection of common problems of small cities in AS and possible solutions.  **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_handbook_wp5|in-depth information about recommendation on Innovative strategies]]**|
 |[[http://www.alpine-space.eu/uploads/tx_txrunningprojects/4th_Synthesis_of_partners_dashboards_action_sheet_March2011.pdf|WP6 Pilot cases implementation]]|[[Report]]| EN        | Policy maker; civil servants / administration; planner; specific institutions   |Reports from project partners on implementation of actions in pilot sites.  **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_pilot_cases|in-depth information about report on pilot cases implementation]]**  | |[[http://www.alpine-space.eu/uploads/tx_txrunningprojects/4th_Synthesis_of_partners_dashboards_action_sheet_March2011.pdf|WP6 Pilot cases implementation]]|[[Report]]| EN        | Policy maker; civil servants / administration; planner; specific institutions   |Reports from project partners on implementation of actions in pilot sites.  **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_pilot_cases|in-depth information about report on pilot cases implementation]]**  |
-|[[http://www.alpine-space.eu/uploads/tx_txrunningprojects/Innocite_WP5_Handbook.pdf|SWOT - Handbook for WP 5]]|[[Report]]| EN        | Decision-maker Planner Scientists Specific institutions   |SWOT analysis of pilot areas and some common conclusions regarding SMESTO's in AS. **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_swot_handbook_wp5|in-depth information about SWOT on Handbook WP5]]** +|[[http://www.alpine-space.eu/uploads/tx_txrunningprojects/Innocite_WP5_Handbook.pdf|SWOT - Handbook for WP 5]]|[[Report]]| EN        | Policy maker; civil servants / administration; planner; specific institutions   |SWOT analysis of pilot areas and some common conclusions regarding SMESTO's in AS. **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_swot_handbook_wp5|in-depth information about SWOT on Handbook WP5]]** 
-|[[http://www.innocite.eu/Lists/PublicAreaDocs/InnoServices_English_version.zip|INNOservices]]|[[Tool]]| EN        | Decision-maker Planner Scientists Specific institutions   |The tool is integrated in the InnoServices methodology for territorial diagnosis and development of business services. It helps to have a territorial vision on multicriteria evaluation of the services and constitutes a tool for decision support.   The use of the tool is done in two phases: a period of adaptation to local territorial context (setting) and a time to assess services and assist in the decision. **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_innoservices| in-depth information about INNOservices]]**  +|[[http://www.innocite.eu/Lists/PublicAreaDocs/InnoServices_English_version.zip|INNOservices]]|[[Tool]]| EN        | Economic sector, policy-makers   |The tool is integrated in the InnoServices methodology for territorial diagnosis and development of business services. It helps to have a territorial vision on multicriteria evaluation of the services and constitutes a tool for decision support. The use of the tool is done in two phases: a period of adaptation to local territorial context (setting) and a time to assess services and assist in the decision. **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_innoservices| in-depth information about INNOservices]]** | 
-|Survey to decisionmakers and shopkeepers|tool|DE|Document presents a checklist for town assessment|+|Survey to decisionmakers and shopkeepers|tool|DE|decision-makers| Document presents a checklist for town assessment. **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_survey|in-depth information about Survey to decisionmakers and shopkeepers]]** |  
 +|Innocité Pilot Sites Forum |guidelines | EN | policy maker; civil servants / administration; planner; specific institutions |Pilot sites forum took place on 17th and 18th of June 2010 amd was dedicated to the development challenges of a small townes positioned in the metropolitan context. **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_pilot_sites|in-depth information about Innocité Pilot Sites Forum]]**| 
 +|Transnational comparison of the pilot sites | report |EN|involved partners|The document present the results of the analysis, based on Innocite diagnosis tool. **[[wiki:more_about_innocite_transnational_comparison|in-depth information about Transnational comparison of the pilot sites]]**|
  
-==Outcomes and Impacts== 
-Unlike project outputs, outcomes and results cannot be described in a standardised way. Therefore, they are listed as free text:\\  
-//<not yet available>// 
  
-{{tag>"territorial development" "urban-rural partnership" "peri-urban development"]}}+{{tag>"territorial development" "urban-rural partnership" "peri-urban development" "EU project"}}
  
 === Synergies === === Synergies ===
wiki/innocite.1418388687.txt.gz · Last modified: 2014/12/12 13:51 by matejash