User Tools

Site Tools


wiki:methodology

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
wiki:methodology [2017/12/22 10:50]
catie
wiki:methodology [2017/12/30 19:04] (current)
mauro [Participatory approaches: the World Cafe]
Line 17: Line 17:
 2. What are the benefits that different stakeholders expect to obtain from the implementation of the ES approach? 2. What are the benefits that different stakeholders expect to obtain from the implementation of the ES approach?
  
-{{  :​en:​world_cafe_4_benefits.jpg?​nolink&​300}} Diverse benefits were highlighted for diverse stakeholders. For example, civil servants highlighted how the ES approach can help improve both the network and dialogue between public and private actors by providing methodologies and tools for decision-making. The possibility to use a long-term perspective,​ the introduction of new ideas to catalyse innovation, the creation of additional income opportunities (e.g. payment ​for ecosystem services) and the opportunity to use it as an awareness raising approach, were presented among a range of other options..+{{  :​en:​world_cafe_4_benefits.jpg?​nolink&​300}} Diverse benefits were highlighted for diverse stakeholders. For example, civil servants highlighted how the ES approach can help improve both the network and dialogue between public and private actors by providing methodologies and tools for decision-making. The possibility to use a long-term perspective,​ the introduction of new ideas to catalyse innovation, the creation of additional income opportunities (e.g. through payments ​for ecosystem services) and the opportunity to use it as an awareness raising approach, were presented among a range of other options..
  
 3. What are the challenges that different stakeholders might face from the implementation of the ES approach? 3. What are the challenges that different stakeholders might face from the implementation of the ES approach?
Line 26: Line 26:
  
 Different perspectives where considered for addressing uses of project results. For public stakeholders,​ the ES assessment and mapping could inform and drive decision making and investment priorities as well as facilitate the development of new policies and regulations including the ES concept. AlpES results could also be used for providing internal training to public entities. For private stakeholders,​ the results could help developing market based instruments or contributing to local development. as well as assess impacts associated with development activities and investments,​ set-up specific mitigation or compensation measures as well as prevent and manage ES trade-offs. Different perspectives where considered for addressing uses of project results. For public stakeholders,​ the ES assessment and mapping could inform and drive decision making and investment priorities as well as facilitate the development of new policies and regulations including the ES concept. AlpES results could also be used for providing internal training to public entities. For private stakeholders,​ the results could help developing market based instruments or contributing to local development. as well as assess impacts associated with development activities and investments,​ set-up specific mitigation or compensation measures as well as prevent and manage ES trade-offs.
 +
  
 ==== Participatory approaches: understanding ecosystem services at the community level in northeastern Italy ==== ==== Participatory approaches: understanding ecosystem services at the community level in northeastern Italy ====
wiki/methodology.txt · Last modified: 2017/12/30 19:04 by mauro