wiki:stakeh_france
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
wiki:stakeh_france [2014/12/13 13:57] – dominikcs | wiki:stakeh_france [2017/03/24 14:39] (current) – andreash | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | **Stakeholder | + | ===== Stakeholder |
Over the period from 2007 to 2013, 44 French institutions have participated in 28 Alpine Space (hereafter AS) projects from the thematic fields “inclusive growth” (hereafter IG) and “resource efficiency and ecosystem management” (hereafter RE). Six of these (14 %) have been lead partner of a project. There was only one institution that worked on projects of both thematic fields (Institute of Alpine Research in Grenoble). Across the two thematic fields, both projects and institutions were equally distributed (14 projects from each field, 28 and 29 project participations for IG and RE respectively). Yet, remarkably, the majority of institutions only contributed to one project (77 per cent), and only two institutions participated in 3 or 4 projects (IRSTEA Mountain Ecosystems research unit in Grenoble and the LIRIS Laboratory in Lyon). Overall, French institutions participated 57 times over the period.\\ | Over the period from 2007 to 2013, 44 French institutions have participated in 28 Alpine Space (hereafter AS) projects from the thematic fields “inclusive growth” (hereafter IG) and “resource efficiency and ecosystem management” (hereafter RE). Six of these (14 %) have been lead partner of a project. There was only one institution that worked on projects of both thematic fields (Institute of Alpine Research in Grenoble). Across the two thematic fields, both projects and institutions were equally distributed (14 projects from each field, 28 and 29 project participations for IG and RE respectively). Yet, remarkably, the majority of institutions only contributed to one project (77 per cent), and only two institutions participated in 3 or 4 projects (IRSTEA Mountain Ecosystems research unit in Grenoble and the LIRIS Laboratory in Lyon). Overall, French institutions participated 57 times over the period.\\ | ||
The distribution of French partners across projects is heterogeneous. Most of the projects involved one or two institutions. Eight projects, however, involved 3 or even 4 institutions from the French stakeholder landscape; a fact that points at high interest for the specific issues of these projects and rather strong networks at regional and local level. | The distribution of French partners across projects is heterogeneous. Most of the projects involved one or two institutions. Eight projects, however, involved 3 or even 4 institutions from the French stakeholder landscape; a fact that points at high interest for the specific issues of these projects and rather strong networks at regional and local level. | ||
- | __Most | + | === Most important |
* both thematic fields have been equally distributed across projects and institutions | * both thematic fields have been equally distributed across projects and institutions | ||
* 77 per cent of the partners only contributed to one project, but 8 projects involved 3 or even 4 French institutions | * 77 per cent of the partners only contributed to one project, but 8 projects involved 3 or even 4 French institutions | ||
Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
* several networks of institutions through AS, but only one large network with strong influence on spatial development | * several networks of institutions through AS, but only one large network with strong influence on spatial development | ||
- | __Branche, types and areas of work__\\ | + | === Branches, types and areas of work === |
Given the variety of topics among projects, the variety of French stakeholders in institution types and areas of work across the two thematic fields is not surprising. Although we can identify 14 types of institutions, | Given the variety of topics among projects, the variety of French stakeholders in institution types and areas of work across the two thematic fields is not surprising. Although we can identify 14 types of institutions, | ||
- | __Spatial distribution__\\ | + | === Spatial distribution === |
Some spatial disparities become apparent when we look at the spatial distribution of project participation for the two thematic fields. The majority of projects involved participants from the Isere (11) and Rhone (12) departments, | Some spatial disparities become apparent when we look at the spatial distribution of project participation for the two thematic fields. The majority of projects involved participants from the Isere (11) and Rhone (12) departments, | ||
- | __Influence | + | ===Influence |
We (qualitatively) estimated influences on spatial development at the main scale of intervention for every institution. Most of the French partners in AS projects operate at regional (22) or local level (15), which is in line with the objectives of the AS programme to operate specifically at regional and local level in order to foster territorial cohesion. Nevertheless, | We (qualitatively) estimated influences on spatial development at the main scale of intervention for every institution. Most of the French partners in AS projects operate at regional (22) or local level (15), which is in line with the objectives of the AS programme to operate specifically at regional and local level in order to foster territorial cohesion. Nevertheless, | ||
- | __Interpretation__\\ | + | ===Interpretation=== |
The analysis revealed notable imbalances in the group of French institutions that participated in AS projects of the two thematic fields.\\ | The analysis revealed notable imbalances in the group of French institutions that participated in AS projects of the two thematic fields.\\ | ||
**First**, participation is not equally distributed across the French alpine territory. Notable concentrations are situated in the Isere and Rhône departments, | **First**, participation is not equally distributed across the French alpine territory. Notable concentrations are situated in the Isere and Rhône departments, |
wiki/stakeh_france.1418475476.txt.gz · Last modified: 2014/12/13 13:57 by dominikcs