Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- wiki:stakeholder_analysis [2014/05/05 15:50] – fidesb
+++ wiki:stakeholder_analysis [2017/03/24 14:35] (current) – andreash
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-**Stakeholder analysis**\\
+===== Stakeholder Perspective =====
+WIKIAlps is dedicated to analyse **[[stakeholders]]** for the rather general issue “Sustainable spatial development” in the thematic fields of “inclusive growth” and “resource efficiency and ecosystem management” for the Alpine Space region. It is obvious that it is not possible to perform a stakeholder analysis within the project by using the common methods for three main reasons:
-WIKIAlps is dedicated to analyse stakeholders for the rather general issue “Sustainable spatial development” in the thematic fields of “inclusive growth” and “resource efficiency and ecosystem management” for the Alpine Space region. It is obvious that it is not possible to perform a stakeholder analysis within the project by using the common methods for three main reasons:
   * The issues are not clearly enough defined;
   * The spatial dimension is too large;
@@ Line 8: / Line 7: @@
 Consequently a new approach of stakeholder analysis will be applied in order to give interesting stakeholder information to the program authorities of the Alpine Space Program as adequate for a capitalizing project like WIKIAlps.
-\\
+===The Method Applied===
-**THE METHOD APLIED**
 There is a broad variety of stakeholders in the Alpine Space which hold or could hold interests the issue of sustainable spatial development in the thematic fields of “inclusive growth” and “resource efficiency and ecosystem management”. These issues touch not only all spatial planning stakeholders, but every economic sector from forestry to business and public services and on different spatial levels from municipalities to transnational organisations.
 For all these reasons named in the previous paragraphs we suggest to abandon the idea of analyzing stakeholders in the usual way, but to analyse institutions. \\
-We will try to perform a stakeholder analysis on an institutional level using the Alpine Space project partner as a starting point.
+The WIKIAlps project partners performed a stakeholder analysis on an institutional level using the Alpine Space project partner as a starting point. **[[More about the method]]
-\\
-(ImAGE MISSING)
-\\
-===Step 1: List of stakeholders and assessing them===
-All institutions which participated at Alpine Space projects in the two selected thematic fields will be described with several attributes.\\
-The first idea of attributes is:\\
-  * Type (Governmental / Politics, Administration, Private economy, Lobby group / Chamber, Civil society/NGO, Research)
-  * Spatial level (Local, Regional, National, International)
-  * Thematic focus or branch (selected branches following the NACE-classes upper level for private economy, for government/administration and civil society other)
-  * Relation to the Alps (within the perimeter of the Alpine Convention, the Alpine Space or outside)
-  * Relation to the Alpine Space Program: participated already as PP, subcontractor or observer or not ? Evtl. Several roles possible, e.g. CIPRA is observer and project partner in different projects
-  * Does the institution participate at more than one project?
-  * Attribute describing the “Influence” or “Impact” the institution has (short free text)
-  * Main tasks of the institution in the field of sustainable regional development (probably easier for government and administrative structures and not always possible to identify)
-===Step 2: Analysis of participating institutions===
-After attributing all institutions the first analysis will be descriptive statistics like frequency of types, branches/thematic focus, spatial levels and the other categories our partnership decided to assess. Several aggregations are conceivable, but will be determined after the decision about the attributes. Also the comparison between the different countries could be interesting.
-===Step 3: „Missing“ institutions===
-The results of step 2 hopefully show already “gaps” in the different countries. Doing this step the different administrative and organizational systems in the countries are to be respected.
-Reflecting the participating institutions with the thematic fields and our knowledge about the institutions in our countries we probably will have some ideas which institution would be interesting as partner in the program, for dissemination or teaching of results, implementation of project outcomes into practice or support on policy level. The target would be to complete the network of institutions. Add these institutions to the stakeholder list and assess them.
-\\
-The Result would be a „landscape“ of stakeholders involved or to be involved in “sustainable spatial development” in the thematic fields of “inclusive growth” and “resource efficiency and ecosystem management” for the Alpine Space region.