wiki:moreco
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
wiki:moreco [2014/12/15 11:27] – dominikcs | wiki:moreco [2017/03/23 14:23] (current) – apolderman | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | **MORECO** | + | =====MORECO===== |
{{ : | {{ : | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
^ Output^ [[wiki: | ^ Output^ [[wiki: | ||
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | |Tools for households|[[Tool]]|EN, | + | |Tools for households|[[Tool]]|EN, |
- | |Tools for Planners and Mobility Actors: [[http:// | + | |Tools for Planners and Mobility Actors: [[http:// |
- | |Tools for Planners and Mobility Actors: [[http:// | + | |Tools for Planners and Mobility Actors: [[http:// |
- | |Tools for Planners and Mobility Actors: [[http:// | + | |Tools for Planners and Mobility Actors: [[http:// |
- | |Tools for Planners and Mobility Actors: | + | |Tools for Planners and Mobility Actors: |
- | |Policy-Maker tool: [[http:// | + | |Policy-Maker tool: [[http:// |
- | |Policy-Maker tool (Annex): [[http:// | + | |Policy-Maker tool (Annex): [[http:// |
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | ==Résumé of project outputs== | + | === In-depth analysis === |
- | | + | __**Results which are directly or indirectly suitable or applicable for practitioners / politicians and civil servants / administration**__ |
+ | \\ | ||
The project with its different dissemination outputs had a strong operational perspective. "Pilot actions were used to stimulate awareness and discussions regarding urban sprawl | The project with its different dissemination outputs had a strong operational perspective. "Pilot actions were used to stimulate awareness and discussions regarding urban sprawl | ||
- | and dynamic settlement developments in the hinterland of Alpine cities amongst regional stakeholders and to lead towards concrete activities." | + | and dynamic settlement developments in the hinterland of Alpine cities amongst regional stakeholders and to lead towards concrete activities." |
- | * **good practice collections of tools**, | + | |
- | * the **specific tools for each target group**, and | + | |
- | * the white paper which is a **transferable governance strategy** presented as guideline for policy makers. It contains all outputs, with recommendations and implementation description for technicians. | + | |
+ | __**Which of the project results are usable for which aspect of SSD and which are the most relevant for practitioners / politicians and civil servants / administration? | ||
+ | // | ||
+ | * Good Practice Collection of Integrated Planning Approaches | ||
+ | * Guideline and framework: Tools for Planners and Mobility Actors | ||
+ | * A) Regional analysis tools, Maps | ||
+ | * B) Settlement assessment tool | ||
+ | * C) Mobility planning tool | ||
+ | * Guideline and framework: Policy-Maker tool, slide pool | ||
+ | * White Book and Declaration | ||
+ | //Inducing behavorial change:// | ||
+ | * Good Practice Collection of Tools | ||
+ | * Guideline and framework: Tools for Households | ||
+ | * Tools for Households\\ | ||
- | __Which kinds of stakeholders have been involved, how have their competences been used in the project and are there options | + | __**Are |
- | Mainly local and regional policy makers | + | The majority of outputs are only available in English, e.g. guidelines |
- | __Are the results | + | |
- | The SWOT-tool, the pilot actions and especially the roadmaps contribute | + | |
- | The systematic SWOT analysis | + | |
- | __What could be long-term outcomes of this project? If none, why low impact? Why high impact? What is needed to achieve outcomes in the long-run? | + | |
- | Some pilot regions started projects in the frame of Demochange, which are continued after the project ended. E.g. the pilot region Nidwalden started 4 activities which are pursued (Revitalize old knowledge; Future Living Facilities; On the spoor of culture and nature; Apprenticeship in trade and crafts) (Source: http:// | + | |
- | Further long-term outcome could be higher awareness | + | |
- | ==Outcomes and Impacts== | + | __**Which kinds of stakeholders have been involved, how have their competences been used in the project and are there options for a better implementation? |
+ | \\ | ||
+ | Three types of stakeholders have been involved, specifically in the 7 pilot regions: Households (Households, | ||
+ | |||
+ | __**Are the results (tool, method, indicator, recommendation) directly or indirectly addressing the strategic objectives for the Alpine Space? | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | Yes, as the tools adress the integration of urban and transport development, | ||
+ | |||
+ | " | ||
+ | planning actions and fostering the public transport. This leads to a decrease in the use of private cars, | ||
+ | to a reduction of traffic, congestion and pollution, to an improvement of the accessibility to services, | ||
+ | and to a better connectivity within cities, with their hinterland and among cities. All these actions will | ||
+ | result in a better quality of life, which will benefit from a rational planning. It directly influences climate | ||
+ | change by avoiding future private motorised traffic, secures access and the use of existing | ||
+ | infrastructures and reinforces polycentric territorial patterns." | ||
+ | |||
+ | The outputs try to contribute to a strong balance between territorial and mobility planning. More specifically, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Direct influence: | ||
+ | * Good Practice Collection of Integrated Planning Approaches | ||
+ | * Good Practice Collection of Tools | ||
+ | * White Book and Declaration | ||
+ | |||
+ | Indirect influence: | ||
+ | * Guideline and framework: Tools for Planners and Mobility Actors | ||
+ | * A) Regional analysis tools, Maps | ||
+ | * B) Settlement assessment tool | ||
+ | * C) Mobility planning tool | ||
+ | * Guideline and framework: Policy-Maker tool, slide pool | ||
+ | * Guideline and framework: Tools for Households | ||
+ | * Tools for Households\\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | __**What could be long-term outcomes of this project? If none, why low impact? Why high impact? What is needed to achieve outcomes in the long-run? | ||
+ | In general, | ||
+ | |||
+ | For the pilot regions, long-term outcomes of the project could be an **increased awareness** of all stakeholders, | ||
+ | |||
+ | For the civil society and households, **awareness** on mobility costs, accessibility of public services and location alternatives might influence location preferences, | ||
+ | |||
+ | However, project outputs should be considered as experimental case studies in the pilot regions, even if tools are already operational. To achieve long-term outcomes, the project states that the applied methods should be leveraged by **new actions** in the pilot regions in the future, and potentially beyond (see also the white paper: lessons learnt).\\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Outcomes and Impacts | ||
Unlike project outputs, outcomes and results cannot be described in a standardised way. Therefore, they are listed as free text: | Unlike project outputs, outcomes and results cannot be described in a standardised way. Therefore, they are listed as free text: | ||
- | __ | + | __**Achievements that could be further |
- | Achievements that could be further | + | * Inhabitants of the pilot regions |
- | The SWOTTOOL can be implemented in all Alpine | + | * Adequate training sessions for major local stakeholders, |
- | A translation | + | tools themselves are part of the good practices |
- | __ | + | * Basically, |
- | Remaining | + | * Overall methodologies and tool developments are accessible, but only in English. Theoretical basis of household motivations are given also in English. The approach is thus transferable, |
- | Besides the “Short | + | |
- | __Emerging contradictions__\\ | + | __**Remaining |
- | none\\ | + | * The statistical local/regional |
+ | * The adaptation | ||
+ | * Measuring the impact of awareness-raising actions concerning the urban sprawl has not been possible at the moment | ||
+ | * A social change (what MORECO dissemination wanted | ||
+ | __**Emerging contradictions**__\\ | ||
+ | Project aims and outputs seem to be coherent with SSD aims. Encouraging housing in central and dense locations, however, might reinforce the demand in these areas, leading to higher housing prices. In the end, a household might end up with an equally high budget compared to a location farer away where he would have higher travel costs. Changing preferences has to go in line with construction and housing price policy.\\ | ||
=== Accessibility of project results === | === Accessibility of project results === | ||
- | * [[http:// | + | * [[http:// |
- | * [[http:// | + | * [[http:// |
- | + | ||
- | {{tag>" | + | |
=== Synergies === | === Synergies === | ||
Line 122: | Line 171: | ||
* [[wiki: | * [[wiki: | ||
* [[wiki: | * [[wiki: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{tag>" |
wiki/moreco.1418639256.txt.gz · Last modified: 2014/12/15 11:27 by dominikcs