User Tools

Site Tools


Sidebar





This project is co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund through the Interreg Alpine Space programme

This project is co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund through the Interreg Alpine Space programme

This project is co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund through the Interreg Alpine Space programme

wiki:perception_of_ecosystem_services

Perception of Ecosystem Services

More than a decade after the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) Governments and policymakers are increasingly adopting the ecosystem service concept, as a comprehensive approach of natural capital management and protection. The ecosystem service approach is seen as a possibility to enhance the efficient and sustainable use of ecosystems and natural capital (Schaefer et al., 2015)1) . However, successful implementation is still in early stages. While the scientific basis for the concept is still under development and intensively discussed amongst (part of) the scientific community (Wensem et al., 2016)2) , many experts or stakeholder do not even know the concept 3)) ) . The same is true for the general public as pointed out by Thomson et al., 20164) . To promote the implementation of ES assessment and its consideration in regional planning and landscape management the ecosystem service concept must be concise and understandable. Furthermore, ecosystem service research should focus on practical applications and the transferability of results. For this it is important to consider the perceived importance of ecosystem services. Haida et al.5) reported that the perceived importance of ecosystem services shows a pattern that recalls Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Stakeholder ranked ecosystem services which satisfy physiological needs at the top followed by services related to safety and security needs. Cultural ecosytem services were perceived as less important.

See also:

Glossary

Research Group Ecosystem Research and Landscape Ecology

1) Schaefer, Mark; Goldman, Erica; Bartuska, Ann M.; Sutton-Grier, Ariana; Lubchenco, Jane (2015): Nature as capital. Advancing and incorporating ecosystem services in United States federal policies and programs. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112 (24), S. 7383–7389. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1420500112.
2) Van Wensem, J., Calow, P., Dollacker, A., Maltby, L., Olander, L., Tuvendal, M. and Van Houtven, G. (2017), Identifying and assessing the application of ecosystem services approaches in environmental policies and decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manag, 13: 41–51. doi:10.1002/ieam.1836
3) 3
4) Thompson JL, Kaiser A, Sparks EL, Shelton M, Brunden E, Cherry JA and Cebrian J (2016) Ecosystem – What? Public Understanding and Trust in Conservation Science and Ecosystem Services. Front. Commun. 1:3. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2016.00003
5) Haida, Christin; Rüdisser, Johannes; Tappeiner, Ulrike (2016): Ecosystem services in mountain regions. Experts perceptions and research intensity. In: Reg Environ Change 16 (7), S. 1989–2004. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-015-0759-4.
You could leave a comment if you were logged in.
wiki/perception_of_ecosystem_services.txt · Last modified: 2017/08/17 14:48 by apolderman